Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Priority and Fairness for API Server Requests #1040

Closed
4 tasks
yue9944882 opened this issue May 3, 2019 · 157 comments
Closed
4 tasks

Priority and Fairness for API Server Requests #1040

yue9944882 opened this issue May 3, 2019 · 157 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. stage/stable Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status

Comments

@yue9944882
Copy link
Member

yue9944882 commented May 3, 2019

Enhancement Description

Please to keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team track efficiently the evolution of the enhancement

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label May 3, 2019
@kacole2
Copy link
Contributor

kacole2 commented May 3, 2019

@yue9944882 the 1.15 enhancement freeze was on 4/30. The KEP is still in a provisional state and still requires graduation criteria. This will not make it in 1.15 without filing an exception and fixing what I had just mentioned.

@kacole2 kacole2 added the tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team label May 3, 2019
@kacole2
Copy link
Contributor

kacole2 commented May 7, 2019

/milestone v1.15
/sig api-machinery
/stage alpha

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. labels May 7, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.15 milestone May 7, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label May 7, 2019
@kacole2 kacole2 added tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team labels May 7, 2019
@makoscafee
Copy link

Hey, @yue9944882 👋 I'm the v1.15 docs Lead.
Does this enhancement require any new docs (or modifications)?

Just a friendly reminder we're looking for a PR against k/website (branch dev-1.15) due by Thursday, May 30th. It would be great if it's the start of the full documentation, but even a placeholder PR is acceptable. Let me know if you have any questions!

@kacole2
Copy link
Contributor

kacole2 commented May 28, 2019

Hi @yue9944882 @MikeSpreitzer . Code Freeze is Thursday, May 30th 2019 @ EOD PST. All enhancements going into the release must be code-complete, including tests, and have docs PRs open.

Please list all current k/k PRs so they can be tracked going into freeze. If the PRs aren't merged by freeze, this feature will slip for the 1.15 release cycle. Only release-blocking issues and PRs will be allowed in the milestone.

If you know this will slip, please reply back and let us know. Thanks!

@kacole2
Copy link
Contributor

kacole2 commented May 30, 2019

Hi @yue9944882 @MikeSpreitzer , today is code freeze for the 1.15 release cycle. I do not see a reply for any k/k PRs to track for this merge. It's now being marked as At Risk in the 1.15 Enhancement Tracking Sheet. If there is no response, or you respond with PRs to track and they are not merged by EOD PST, this will be dropped from the 1.15 Milestone. After this point, only release-blocking issues and PRs will be allowed in the milestone with an exception.

@kacole2
Copy link
Contributor

kacole2 commented May 31, 2019

/milestone clear

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed this from the v1.15 milestone May 31, 2019
@kacole2 kacole2 added tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team labels May 31, 2019
@evillgenius75
Copy link

evillgenius75 commented Jul 8, 2019

Hi @MikeSpreitzer and @yue9944882 , I'm a 1.16 Enhancement Shadow. Is this feature going to be graduating to alpha stage in 1.16? Please let me know so it can be added to the 1.16 Tracking Spreadsheet. If not's graduating, I will remove it from the milestone and change the tracked label.

I see you have PR kubernetes/kubernetes#78966 referenced above, please include any other relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly.

Milestone dates are Enhancement Freeze 7/30 and Code Freeze 8/29.

Thank you.

@yue9944882
Copy link
Member Author

hey, yes please track the feature in the 1.16 milestone. matter of fact this feature is literally active from 1.15 on, as you see in the pull above there's ~300 discussions over the api model since april this year. there're also other poc repos under development:

we will get into 1.16 this time 👏🏻

@kacole2
Copy link
Contributor

kacole2 commented Jul 9, 2019

/milestone v1.16

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.16 milestone Jul 9, 2019
@kacole2 kacole2 added tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Jul 9, 2019
@sethmccombs
Copy link

Hey @yue9944882 @MikeSpreitzer,

I'm one of the v1.16 docs shadows.
Does this enhancement (or the work planned for v1.16) require any new docs (or modifications to existing docs)? If not, can you please update the 1.16 Enhancement Tracker Sheet (or let me know and I’ll do so)

If so, just a friendly reminder we're looking for a PR against k/website (branch dev-1.16) due by Friday, August 23rd, it can just be a placeholder PR at this time. Let me know if you have any questions!

@MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member

@evillgenius75 : Yes, this feature needs docs. I do not see how to update the tracking spreadsheet myself; is that something I leave to you?

@sethmccombs : please see my plea for help on the sig-docs Slack channel of the Kubernetes workspace

@rayandas
Copy link
Member

Hey again @yue9944882 @MikeSpreitzer 👋, 1.29 Enhancements team here,

Just checking in as we approach code freeze at 01:00 UTC Wednesday 1st November 2023: .

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • All PRs to the Kubernetes repo that are related to your enhancement are linked in the above issue description (for tracking purposes).

  • All PR/s are ready to be merged (they have approved and lgtm labels applied) by the code freeze deadline. This includes tests.

Please update the Issue description to include all the related PRs of this KEP under the stable section in the Github Issue description. The status for this KEP is currently at risk for code freeze.

Also, please let me know if there are other PRs in k/k we should be tracking for this KEP.
As always, we are here to help if any questions come up. Thanks!

@a-mccarthy
Copy link

Hi @yue9944882 @MikeSpreitzer, 👋 from the v1.29 Release Team-Communications! We would like to check if you have any plans to publish a blog for this KEP regarding new features, removals, and deprecations for this release.

If so, you need to open a PR placeholder in the website repository.
The deadline will be on Tuesday 14th November 2023 (after the Docs deadline PR ready for review)

Here is the 1.29 calendar

@npolshakova
Copy link

Hey @yue9944882 @MikeSpreitzer, Enhancements lead here. Are both of these PRs tracking the code changes for this KEP?

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor

tkashem commented Nov 5, 2023

@npolshakova yes, all the code PRs have merged, thanks!

and the conformance test pr is being tracked here: kubernetes/kubernetes#121718

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor

tkashem commented Nov 15, 2023

draft PR for doc update: kubernetes/website#43946

@salehsedghpour
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @yue9944882 @MikeSpreitzer , 👋 1.30 Enhancements lead here
As it has graduated to Stable and the KEP status is still implementable, may you please update the status to implemented and close this issue once the update PR has merged?

@salehsedghpour
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label lead-opted-in

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release label Jan 6, 2024
@salehsedghpour
Copy link
Contributor

Hello 👋 1.30 Enhancements Lead here,

I'm closing milestone 1.29 now,
If you wish to progress this enhancement in v1.30, please follow the instructions here to opt in the enhancement and make sure the lead-opted-in label is set so it can get added to the tracking board and finally add /milestone v1.30. Thanks!

/milestone clear

@MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member

/label lead-opted-in

@MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member

@salehsedghpour : I created #4429 to update the kep.yaml. I am not entirely clear on where to put the lead-opted-in label, you see I just tried and nothing happened.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeSpreitzer: Can not set label lead-opted-in: Must be member in one of these teams: [release-team-enhancements release-team-leads sig-api-machinery-leads sig-apps-leads sig-architecture-leads sig-auth-leads sig-autoscaling-leads sig-cli-leads sig-cloud-provider-leads sig-cluster-lifecycle-leads sig-contributor-experience-leads sig-docs-leads sig-instrumentation-leads sig-k8s-infra-leads sig-multicluster-leads sig-network-leads sig-node-leads sig-release-leads sig-scalability-leads sig-scheduling-leads sig-security-leads sig-storage-leads sig-testing-leads sig-windows-leads]

In response to this:

/label lead-opted-in

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Jan 22, 2024

/milestone v1.30
/label lead-opted-in

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.30 milestone Jan 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release label Jan 22, 2024
@salehsedghpour
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeSpreitzer, Thanks for the update.
I guess I made a mistake here, to clarify things, is there going to be any changes on this KEP (except the implemented status)?
If not, this issue can be closed as it is completed (stable), right?

@salehsedghpour
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeSpreitzer, shall we close this issue/Enhancement as #4429 is merged?

@MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member

We are still getting and contemplating requests for more changes. I am not sure how this goes. Is a KEP an evergreen document that is maintained as a feature changes? Or does it start rotting once the feature goes GA?

@sreeram-venkitesh
Copy link
Member

sreeram-venkitesh commented Feb 7, 2024

@MikeSpreitzer I believe k/enhancements issues are usually closed after the feature goes GA. @salehsedghpour Please correct me if I'm wrong.

@salehsedghpour: Also, if we don't have any code changes for this KEP in this release, do you think we should mark this KEP as Tracked for enhancements freeze? If we have any code change then it makes sense since we will come back to this again before the code freeze, but if there are no code changes should we keep the KEP in the tracking board?

@salehsedghpour
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeSpreitzer I'm sorry, it's my bad, as @sreeram-venkitesh said, enhancements are usually closed after graduating to stable. For new features, you may need to create a new KEP.

With all that, I'm closing this issue and mark it as removed from milestone.

@salehsedghpour
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-label lead-opted-in

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release label Feb 7, 2024
@MikeSpreitzer
Copy link
Member

@salehsedghpour : we do have a few things planned for upcoming releases, because of certain changes that have to be staged over several releases.

@salehsedghpour
Copy link
Contributor

/milestone clear

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed this from the v1.30 milestone Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. stage/stable Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status
Projects
Status: Deferred
Status: Removed from Milestone
Status: Tracked for Code Freeze
Status: Removed from Milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests