Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sig-cluster-lifecycle: Standard for communicating a local registry #1755

Closed
nicks opened this issue May 8, 2020 · 10 comments
Closed

sig-cluster-lifecycle: Standard for communicating a local registry #1755

nicks opened this issue May 8, 2020 · 10 comments
Labels
sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. tracked/out-of-tree Denotes an out-of-tree enhancement issue, which does not need to be tracked by the Release Team

Comments

@nicks
Copy link
Contributor

nicks commented May 8, 2020

Enhancement Description

Please to keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team track efficiently the evolution of the enhancement

This is a proposal for a standard way that cluster configuration tools should publicize a local registry to app-developer tools.
kubernetes-sigs/kind#1543

The proposal does not require any code changes to Kubernetes. But because it requires agreement on a common standard, sig-cluster-lifecycle suggested using the KEP process to build consensus on the proposal.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label May 8, 2020
@nicks
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicks commented May 8, 2020

/sig cluster-lifeycle

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@nicks: The label(s) sig/cluster-lifeycle cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them

In response to this:

/sig cluster-lifeycle

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@nicks
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicks commented May 8, 2020

/sig cluster-lifecycle

@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

Added the tracked/out-of-tree label after a confirming directly through Slack.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 8, 2020
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 8, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 7, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 6, 2021
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

lets close this to silence the bots and if we want to revisit we can reopen.

@neolit123 neolit123 removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jan 6, 2021
@nicks
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicks commented Jan 7, 2021

Thanks @neolit123 ! Ya, I consider this basically implemented. Microk8s and Kind both advertise this format now, and Tilt reads it. There are open issues for other providers/consumers to support it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. tracked/out-of-tree Denotes an out-of-tree enhancement issue, which does not need to be tracked by the Release Team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants