Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Enabling clients to tell if resource endpoints serve the same set of objects #2341

Closed
4 tasks
shekhar-rajak opened this issue Jan 26, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed
4 tasks

Enabling clients to tell if resource endpoints serve the same set of objects #2341

shekhar-rajak opened this issue Jan 26, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one.

Comments

@shekhar-rajak
Copy link
Contributor

Enhancement Description

  • One-line enhancement description (can be used as a release note):

Enabling clients to tell if resource endpoints serve the same set of objects

  • Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal:

We propose to expand the discovery API to enable clients to tell if resource
endpoints (e.g., extensions/v1beta1/replicaset and apps/v1/replicaset) are
referring the same set of objects.

Motivation

Today, some workload objects (e.g., replicasets) are accessible from both the
extensions and the apps endpoints. This can happen to more of Kubernetes
APIs in the future. Enabling the clients to programmatically detect aliasing
endpoints can improve both the correctness and the efficiency.

  • Discussion Link:
  • Primary contact (assignee): @xuchao
  • Responsible SIGs: sig-api-machinery
  • Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Alpha release target (x.y):
    • Beta release target (x.y):
    • Stable release target (x.y):
  • Alpha
    • KEP (k/enhancements) update PR(s):
    • Code (k/k) update PR(s):
    • Docs (k/website) update PR(s):

Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Jan 26, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@shekhar-rajak: There are no sig labels on this issue. Please add an appropriate label by using one of the following commands:

  • /sig <group-name>
  • /wg <group-name>
  • /committee <group-name>

Please see the group list for a listing of the SIGs, working groups, and committees available.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@shekhar-rajak
Copy link
Contributor Author

#2331 created for migrating the old keps into new template.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 26, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels May 26, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@k8s-ci-robot @fejta-bot @shekhar-rajak