Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Addons via Operators #2492

Closed
4 tasks
shekhar-rajak opened this issue Feb 12, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
4 tasks

Addons via Operators #2492

shekhar-rajak opened this issue Feb 12, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle.

Comments

@shekhar-rajak
Copy link
Contributor

shekhar-rajak commented Feb 12, 2021

Enhancement Description


We propose to use operators for managing cluster addons.  Each addon will have
its own CRD, and users will be able to perform limited tailoring of the addon
(install/don’t install, choose version, primary feature selection) by modifying
the instance of the CRD.  The operator encodes any special logic (e.g. dependencies) needed to
install the addon.

By creating a CRD per addon, we are able make use of the kubernetes API
machinery for those per-addon options.

We will create tooling to make it easy to build addon operators that follow the
best practices we identify as part of this work.  For example, we expect that
most addons will be declarative, and likely be specified as part of a "cluster
bundle", so we will make it easy to build basic addon operators that follow
these patterns.

We hope that components will choose to maintain their own operators, encoding
their knowledge of how best to operate their addon.

  • Discussion Link:
  • Primary contact (assignee): @justinsb
  • Responsible SIGs: sig-cluster-lifecycle
  • Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Alpha release target (x.y):
    • Beta release target (x.y):
    • Stable release target (x.y):
  • Alpha
    • KEP (k/enhancements) update PR(s):
    • Code (k/k) update PR(s):
    • Docs (k/website) update PR(s):

Implementation History

Addon Operator session given by jrjohnson & justinsb at Kubecon NA - Dec 2018
KEP created - Jan 29 2019

Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Feb 12, 2021
@shekhar-rajak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Migrating all the old template keps to new template : #2493

@neolit123 neolit123 added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. labels Feb 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Feb 13, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 9, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 9, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue or PR with /reopen
  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants