Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kubeadm join --control-plane workflow #2500

Closed
4 tasks
shekhar-rajak opened this issue Feb 12, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #3150
Closed
4 tasks

kubeadm join --control-plane workflow #2500

shekhar-rajak opened this issue Feb 12, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #3150
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. stage/stable Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status

Comments

@shekhar-rajak
Copy link
Contributor

shekhar-rajak commented Feb 12, 2021

Enhancement Description

  • One-line enhancement description (can be used as a release note): kubeadm join --control-plane workflow
  • Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal:

https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-cluster-lifecycle/kubeadm/2500-kubeadm-join-control-plane-workflow

Support for high availability is one of the most requested features for kubeadm.

Even if, as of today, there is already the possibility to create an HA cluster
using kubeadm in combination with some scripts and/or automation tools (e.g.
[this](https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/independent/high-availability/)), this KEP was
designed with the objective to introduce an upstream simple and reliable solution for
achieving the same goal.

Such solution will provide a consistent and repeatable base for implementing additional
capabilities like e.g. kubeadm upgrade for HA clusters.
  • Discussion Link:
  • Primary contact (assignee): @fabriziopandini
  • Responsible SIGs: sig-cluster-lifecycle
  • Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
    • Alpha release target (x.y): 1.12
    • Beta release target (x.y): 1.14
    • Stable release target (x.y): 1.24
  • Alpha
    • KEP (k/enhancements) update PR(s):
    • Code (k/k) update PR(s):
    • Docs (k/website) update PR(s):

Implementation History

Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Feb 12, 2021
@shekhar-rajak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Migrating all the old template keps to new template : #2499

@neolit123 neolit123 added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. labels Feb 13, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Feb 13, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 9, 2021
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 9, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@neolit123
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 7, 2021
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

neolit123 commented Dec 7, 2021 via email

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 7, 2021
@neolit123 neolit123 added the stage/stable Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status label Jan 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. stage/stable Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants