-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Recursive Read-only (RRO) mounts #3857
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
/sig node |
adding sig storage as participating sig /sig storage |
@AkihiroSuda do you want to target this KEP for 1.28? |
Not necessary. |
@kubernetes/sig-node-leads |
ping @kubernetes/sig-node-leads 🙏 |
@kubernetes/sig-node-leads |
cc @mrunalp @derekwaynecarr @dchen1107 @SergeyKanzhelev for the question above about v1.30 milestone |
+1 for v1.30
@SergeyKanzhelev do we have to check with sig storage leads about this KEP? |
@mrunalp @derekwaynecarr @dchen1107 @SergeyKanzhelev PTAL. |
@SergeyKanzhelev added sig storage as participating sig for this KEP. The proposal makes sense to me, but I still want to hear from the sig storage members. cc @jsafrane @msau42 @xing-yang Can you please review the proposal and provide your feedback? Thanks! If accepted, this KEP may be able to have an alpha implement in 1.30. |
Didn't get lead-opted-in. Giving up. Alternative: |
Reopening |
/milestone 1.30 |
@mrunalp: The provided milestone is not valid for this repository. Milestones in this repository: [ Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I'll take a look from PRR perspective, but you need to ping sig-node leads to get this included in 1.33 release, it is not currently. |
ping @kubernetes/sig-node-leads |
/label lead-opted-in |
Hello @AkihiroSuda 👋, v1.33 Enhancements team here. Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 02:00 UTC Friday 14th February 2025 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 13th February 2025. This enhancement is targeting stage Here's where this enhancement currently stands:
For this KEP, we would just need to update the following:
The status of this enhancement is marked as If you anticipate missing enhancements freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you! |
Hello @AkihiroSuda 👋, v1.33 Enhancements team here. With all the requirements fulfilled, this enhancement is now marked as tracked for the upcoming enhancements freeze 🚀 |
Hello @AkihiroSuda 👋, v1.33 Docs Lead here. Does this enhancement work planned for v1.33 require any new docs or modification to existing docs? If so, please follow the steps here to open a PR against Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release. Thank you! |
Thanks @AkihiroSuda |
Hi @AkihiroSuda 👋 -- this is Ryota (@rytswd) from the 1.33 Communications Team! For the 1.33 release, we are currently in the process of collecting and curating a list of potential feature blogs, and we'd love for you to consider writing one for your enhancement! Although you have kindly written a feature blog for 1.30 already, would you be keen to get another blog write-up for this making the stable release? To opt in to write a feature blog, could you please let us know and open a "Feature Blog placeholder PR" (which can be only a skeleton at first) against the website repository by Wednesday, 5th March, 2025? For more information about writing a blog, please find the blog contribution guidelines 📚 Tip Some timeline to keep in mind:
Note In your placeholder PR, use |
Hi @AkihiroSuda 👋, 1.33 Communications Team here again! This is a gentle reminder for the feature blog deadline mentioned above, which is 02:00 UTC Wednesday, 5th March, 2025. To opt in, please let us know and open a Feature Blog placeholder PR against Tip Some timeline to keep in mind:
Note In your placeholder PR, use |
Hey again @AkihiroSuda 👋, v1.33 Enhancements team here. Just checking in as we approach code freeze at 02:00 UTC Friday 21st March 2025 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 20th March 2025. Here's where this enhancement currently stands:
Per the issue description, these are all of the implementation (code-related) PRs for 1.33: Please let me know (and keep the issue description updated) if there are any other PRs in k/k that we should track for this KEP, so that we can maintain accurate status. This enhancement is now marked as Please note that KEPs targeting |
Completed |
/reopen I think we should keep this open as a reminder that after 3 releases we can drop the feature gates. |
@kannon92: Reopened this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/stage stable |
Enhancement Description
One-line enhancement description (can be used as a release note): Recursive Read-only (RRO) mounts
Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-node/3857-rro-mounts
Discussion Link: none
Primary contact (assignee): @AkihiroSuda
Responsible SIGs: SIG-node
Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
Alpha
k/enhancements
) update PR(s): KEP-3857: Recursive Read-only (RRO) mounts #3858k/k
) update PR(s):k/website
) update PR(s):Beta
k/enhancements
) update PR(s): KEP-3857: Recursive Read-only (RRO) mounts: promote to Beta #4668k/k
) update PR(s): KEP-3857: promote RecursiveReadOnlyMounts feature to beta kubernetes#125475k/website
) update PR(s):Stable
k/enhancements
) update PR(s): KEP-3857: Recursive Read-only (RRO) mounts: promote to GA #5157k/k
) update PR(s): KEP-3857: Recursive Read-only (RRO) mounts: promote to GA kubernetes#130116k/website
) update(s): KEP-3857: Recursive Read-only (RRO) mounts: promote to GA website#49866Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: